Mike Macgirvin
Diary and Other Rantings
Beyond Silicon Valley
   
Saturday, Jul 05 2008, 01:54 am
Feb 25, 2008
Monday

The school start of session turned out to be a non-event thanks to all the preparatory work we've done in the last few weeks. Yawn. Whew!

Gas prices in San Francisco hit $3.35/gallon. Which infers that peninsula prices are probably closing in on $3.50. Whatever. Don't whine. We pay a bit over $5 here. 

The U.S. shoots down its errant Keyhole satellite. Seems that a load of hydrazine fuel may or may not be the hazardous substance they were warning us about - if indeed there was one. Likely this had something to do with posturing vis-a-vis China who shot a satellite to smithereens (actually large chunks) recently. If the thing smashed up over a major city it wouldn't really matter if it had a full tank or not. The death toll would be about the same either way. The real motive is probably that it was headed for a crash somewhere that the US couldn't get to and lock down the site. 

Nader jumps into the presidential race. Why now?  OK, better question - why at all?  The media never took him seriously enough to do their routine mudslinging probes. Let's quickly figure out what skeletons are in his closet and get rid of him before he screws up yet another election. 

 

Comments? | More Actions Open/Close menu
Feb 19, 2008
Busy...

Getting ready for the start of session next week so my postings have been and may be irregular for a while. Imaging lab machines, importing accounts, installing software for lecturers, that kind of thing. As soon as the students hit it'll be flat out for another few weeks as they all need to know how to set proxies and set up their mail accounts and every other system question that they come up with. 

But just so y'all don't feel totally neglected, here's a public service announcement from the anti-fur society. 

 

elisha.jpg

 

Remember folks, wearing animal fur is bad and makes you look ugly. See what I mean?   

Comments? | More Actions Open/Close menu
Feb 11, 2008
CIA infiltrating Second Life

via itnews: 

Terrorists may be using virtual worlds such as Second Life to meet and exchange ideas, security experts warned today..

...

The CIA already has a presence in Second Life which it uses it for meetings and training.

-----

Careful, the person you have virtual sex with might be either a terrorist or spook. Maybe they'll implant you with a virtual bug. Maybe they'll blow up your virtual house or suicide bomb your virtual store front. The mind reels....

Comments? | More Actions Open/Close menu
Feb 08, 2008
CNN extends geo-targetting

I mentioned in an earlier rant that CNN is now figuring out where you are in the world, and expressed some concern that they would eventually use this to limit or control what news you view based on where you came from.

That day arrived. If you're outside the U.S. and now go to CNN.com you are now redirected to 'edition.cnn.com', which is titled 'CNN.com international'. You see something totally different from the default U.S. page - which if you're looking for it, can now be found at 'us.cnn.com'.

...Though one could legitimately question whether either site will have newsworthy content, regardless of where you're at. 

Comments:

peonyden (Denis Wilson)
February 9, 2008 01:46
peonyden
Hi Mike I read your earlier posting on this subject. Its scary when you know they are monitoring you. I mean, we all hear that it can happen, but when it is happening before your eyes. Personally I am immune to the charms of CNN. Have you tried the Indy Media sites? There is one in Sydney, but I don;t much like it. Still, they do try... http://sydney.indymedia.org.au/story/lets-influence-american-election-sign-here That is gives you a link to the AVAAZ site, where they are organising a petition to the last remaining candidates for the US Presidential elections. Seeing as they rule the world, it seems the least Aussies can do is act like Mosquitoes and buzz around their ears at midnight, and annoy them. After all, for Aussies it is painful seeing so many Americans who do not bother, (or refuse to ) vote. When we who are so heavily influenced by the choices made over there, cannot vote.

mike (Mike Macgirvin)
February 9, 2008 09:23
[*TOP MEMBER*] mike

Hey Denis - I'm not sure I'd call it monitoring in the classical sense. Nobody is watching; it's all automatic. This is something that anybody could do. I've got the tools right here on my disk. You find the IP address and look it up in a master database to figure out what service provider owns it, which will tell you approximately where the visitor is coming from on the planet. From there you can show whatever you think appropriate for that location.

I've thought about doing this to automatically set the timezone.  US visitors see tomorrow's date if I use Aussie time, or Sydney visitors see yesterday if I use California time as the website default. It's easy enough to set this after they login and specify what zone to use, but this way I can do the right thing before they even login.

But a savvy programmer can literally do anything armed with that knowledge, as we've found from Google in China; where 'Tiananmen Square' brings up nothing but articles with pictures of flowers and words of bliss. 

In terms of news, I'm really warming to the BBC. All news is tainted, but they do a pretty good job of reasonably impartial global coverage. I'll have a look at indymedia  as well. 


Joe (Derek Joe Tennant)
February 11, 2008 18:24
Joe

I also am a big fan of BBC news. They do a reasonable job of covering worldwide stories, not just local. And the world is becoming a smaller place. We can't ignore what's happening other places like we used to.

They also did a stellar job covering the aftermath of the 2004 tsunami in Southeast Asia. From Indonesia, Thailand and Sri Lanka, BBC reporters were often the first outsiders to enter the devastated areas. Some of the most poignant reporting I've ever seen, including after September 11, 2001, was from the BBC following the tsunami. I've been a fan ever since.


Comments? | More Actions Open/Close menu
Feb 03, 2008
Modern Vikings

We went to the city today (Sydney) to visit the Viking furniture warehouse. You know the place. Large warehouse, all the products have Nordic names.

I started thinking about the modern Vikings and their contributions to the world. Ikea, Linux, Nokia. They're pretty impressive warriors in the modern world just as they were in the past.  

Comments? | More Actions Open/Close menu
Feb 03, 2008
Super Bowl (Monday)

Super Bowl Sunday is here! Yay!

Oh wait a minute. The game doesn't start for another 24 hours. Roughly 8AM tomorrow (Monday) morning, about the time I'm chugging some coffee and driving down the cliff. Bummer.

Oh well, I haven't really been that big on the Super Bowl since back when Joe Montana and the Niners showed us how the game is meant to be played.  

Comments? | More Actions Open/Close menu
Feb 02, 2008
Stunned would be the word I'm looking for

Microsoft is making a bid to buy Yahoo!. Surprise, shock... What words could describe my emotion on hearing this?

I can see the motivation and the reasoning behind it. They want to put a stop to Google ("I'd like to buy a noun, please."). Still I believe this is the wrong way to do it. The only way for them to stop Google is to buy Google. Don't laugh. They are ideologically more closely aligned than you might realize. I don't believe that they've thought through the consequences of this decision - or maybe they have but just don't care. It is a culture clash of epic proportions that will result pretty much in the destruction of Yahoo! and all they've ever done - and do nothing to harm Google. I suspect many of the employees will quit outright, and there's not much place for them to go in Silicon Valley except to side with the enemy (Google), the largest employer in the valley that's still adding significant headcount.

But I also believe that this move can't be stopped, so it doesn't really matter what I think about it. I would however like to share with you the exact image that popped into my brain on hearing this.

 

Comments? | More Actions Open/Close menu
Feb 01, 2008
The Seven Year Itch

Sometime later this month "Diary and Other Rantings" (i.e. my weblog) will turn 7 years old, and I'll start my eighth year doing this activity called 'blogging'. Perhaps I'll mark the day, perhaps not. We'll see. Maybe I'll just stop doing it altogether. Maybe not. We'll see.

This all started in early 2001. I was at AOL making lots and lots of money from my Netscape stock options. I had a Netscape employee home page that was visited hundreds of thousands of times a day, but this was slowing. AOL no longer linked to it. I had started running a new server in the spare bedroom in 1998-1999, and later moved it to the garage. It took almost two years to get a working DSL link so that I could actually run a public website off of it. High-speed internet to the home was still an experimental technology. DSL wasn't yet ready for prime time and ISDN had other issues which plagued it. Leased-line required somebody to sell you an end-point on the public net and nobody was doing this, besides being limited to 56k which was now the speed of most modems. Web 'hosting' in those days was mostly for big business and costed big money. I could certainly afford it, but decided to spend my cash on more important things (like buying  a music store a year later).

Running a Linux box with an internet link isn't very expensive in the overall scheme of things. So once the DSL was finally working I made a new home page and started improving it.

I think it was Cindy at 'Off the Beaten Path' (now at 'dustingmybrain.com' ) who first introduced me to the concept of a rambling page. Instead of replacing your 'Current Interests' web page every week, you just keep adding to it. Drop in a date. Write what's happening. I started doing this. I was writing HTML in emacs. I called it an online diary. I didn't have titles, categories, RSS feeds, etc. These would come much later. I wasn't writing 'articles', I was just rambling. Why do you need a title for it? That makes it look so structured. The only important thing is the date, so somebody knows when it was that you thought this way. This was important. After several years of living on Netscape time, I firmly believed that one didn't think the same way for very long, and technology was always changing - so information had to have a date.

The other thing that I did was to take a cue from some of the large online news sites, which were the best model available for presenting information that had timestamps. I started writing in reverse chronological order (recent first). This was born of necessity, since nobody wanted to load a large page and scroll to the end to find recent stuff; which was how we did things previously (logfile format).  

In fact I maintained this format for a few years until it became unmanageable. Then I looked for ways of automating my monthly (or whenever) process of moving the current entries to an archive page and starting fresh. So after looking to see what programs were available and trying a few of them, I instead wrote a program to do it myself. Over time that evolved from a simple diary 'archiver' to the thing that you see today - a mega social portal that does everything but make coffee. (I miss this incidentally, I had my computer turn on the coffee pot from an online request in the early 1980s using my first homebrew social portal).  

I still wonder whether anybody reads these pages. Does anybody care? I don't subscribe to the current notions of SEO and affiliate marketing and trackware and all the other ways to improve one's blog ranking. Most notable these days are the pages and pages of 'widgets' attached to every blog, selling everything from online communities to soap. Why bother? Your only visitors will be other bloggers that are all trying to get you to visit their own blog. They aren't really reading what you have to say, they're too busy 'selling' their own wares. Still even after the RSS fiasco a few months back, I manage to pull in a few thousand humans a week. They come and read a page and leave again. This is the state of the modern internet.

It may be of some interest that I've managed to serve up a few hundred million pages since this all started - mostly to crawlers and robots; however last year activity peaked with about 100,000 daily hits (30,000 human visitors) and we've had six or seven days with over a million hits. I've written close to 1500 articles and there have been about 6600 total articles at one time or another from various feeds - before I was forced to nuke them for legal reasons. Only about 250 comments total, which I attribute to my decision a couple years back to do away with the daily spam cleanup and only allow website members to post comments. [I've since revised this policy.]

The 'community portal' (which I started writing a couple of years ago) doesn't have much community and I don't know if that will ever change. Community folks like big parties and unless you have one, you're late to the party. Bloggers only like communities where they can sell their blog.  I don't know how to convince them that a long-running website with several thousand non-blogging human visitors a week is actually a good place to drop a link. Yeah, I could put you on my blogroll, but I read thousands of blogs. It would quickly grow to be unmanageable and you'd be lost in the noise. 

But you can add your own link and profile page and whatever - you don't need me to do it. Hint, hint.  

Anyway - we'll see if this lasts or whether I just decide that there are better things to do. Write into space everyday and maybe a couple of people will read it. Maybe not.

That's what it's all about.

Don't ask yourself if it is actually relevant or important or whether anybody cares. You might not like to hear the true answer. It's one blog amongst hundreds of millions, all trying to be visited. All thinking they should be relevant to somebody. It's like asking if one star in the entire universe is relevant. Maybe one is relevant to somebody. But the big question looms, is it yours? Unless it's the sun and brings life to this planet, it's likely just another star in the vastness of space.  

In fact, nobody really cares whether you blog or not when all is said and done. Well maybe one or two folks. In my case those are the same one or two folks that cared back in 2001. Everybody else is just passing through on their way to somewhere else.

Still every day (sometimes two) I go to my website and ramble about what's on my mind. I tweak the software to make it better. Even knowing that it is all an exercise in futility. Strange.  

Comments? | More Actions Open/Close menu
Leave no stone unturned.
-- Euripides